The Witcher movie from 2001 is terrible, but there's something weirdly charming about it | PC Gamer - hendersonhancy1944
The Witcher moving picture from 2001 is terrible, but there's something weirdly charming roughly information technology
When asked what he thought of Wiedzmin, a 2001 movie adaption of his Witcher novels, author Andrzej Sapkowski said: "I can answer only with a azygos word. An repugnant, albeit a short one." Not exactly a glowing recommendation from the guy who created Geralt of Rivia, but is it really that unfavourable? I've heard a great deal about this pic terminated the years, merely never anything positive. Indeed I decided to watch information technology for myself, because I figure Geralt is a good enough character that anything featuring him can't be completely terrible... flop?
The movie begins with an aimless, disjointed montage display a young Geralt enduring the harrowing Trial of the Grasses and becoming a Witcher. Which ready-made sense to me, being familiar with the lore. But I can only envisage how confusing this succession must be for anyone going in cold. The film assumes a huge amount of knowledge, skimming over things the script should really take the time to explain. Still, it's cool seeing Geralt's origins first-hand; something the Netflix series has yet to do, leastways in its first harden.
Then we leap forward to Geralt as an adult, as the film drags us through a selection of famous Witcher stories at a breakneck pace. We see him hunting for a golden dragon; encountering Duny the cursed, hedgehog-faced knight; meeting his beloved Yennefer for the first time; and becoming the Butcher of Blaviken. These are great stories, but non when they're awkwardly squeezed into a two-60 minutes moving-picture show. Thither's too much going connected, and too little time spent connected the better details, which makes for a frustrating and unsatisfying viewing experience.
Wiedzmin was scene American Samoa a TV serial publication first, then re-edited into a movie subsequently the fact, which explains its odd pacing and inarticulate, disunited structure. It's a mess of a film, but if you treat it like a feature duration Witcher anthology, information technology kinda works. And information technology's a lot more enjoyable if you know the stories already. But its biggest problem, everything else excursus, is that IT's just really boring. There are too many lifeless, static scenes of people slack in chambers having boring conversations in bad medieval costumes.
And the creature personal effects. Buckeye State boy. When Geralt meets the same golden dragon, the CG is comically bad. And you barely see the monsters he battles, because the camera is trying desperately to void lingering on the imitative-looking creature puppets for more than a second at a clip. You just see loads of quick cuts of Geralt rhythmical his steel, and the occasional flash of a rubber tentacle. It's unintentionally hilarious, but there's also something charming roughly it. You can tell they're trying their best.
As for Geralt himself, Michal Zebrowski does a good job. He looks tiny compared to the tremendous beast that is Henry Cavill, but he captures the nitty-gritty of the character well. He's more rugged, a bit rougher around the edges, but as wel keen at showing Geralt's softer side when atomic number 2's with Ciri or Yennefer. He isn't as charismatic as Cavill, which leaves the performance look a puny flat. And he doesn't look as comfortable material possession a sword either. But he's weirder, which I like. Non arsenic stoic. A bit more eccentric.
As for the supporting cast, Zbigniew Zamachowski is great as Jaskier/Dandelion. He's worn and mischievous, and not quite Eastern Samoa youthful and goofy as the Netflix version of the character. Agata Buzek lends Pavetta, Ciri's mother, a precise watchable intensity. In that respect are some songs too, good manners of Jaskier, although none of them are as catchy as Toss A Coin To Your Witcher. Candidly, the acting in Wiedzmin is one part of the film I ne'er really had any issues with. Information technology's the untidy editing, dodgy personal effects, weak defend stage dancing, and prolonged lack of energy that pull round a bad picture.
Should you picke information technology, though? Because a film being bad doesn't necessarily mean information technology isn't Worth watching. I mean, I've watched the 1994 Tough movie the like cardinal times, and that thing sucks. Alas, Wiedzmin isn't so crappy information technology's good; it's just very dull. Don't go in expecting a constant stream of tough B-movie demon battles to cackle at. It's mostly just people standing around chatting. The Netflix series not only tells all the same stories, but tells them better—and with vastly better personal effects. Thusly there really isn't any reason, other than pure curiosity, to watch this.
If it's set in space, Andy will probably write virtually it. He loves sci-fi, run a risk games, fetching screenshots, Twin Peaks, unearthly sims, Alien: Isolation, and anything with a funny.
Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/the-witcher-movie-from-2001-is-terrible-but-theres-something-weirdly-charming-about-it/
Posted by: hendersonhancy1944.blogspot.com
0 Response to "The Witcher movie from 2001 is terrible, but there's something weirdly charming about it | PC Gamer - hendersonhancy1944"
Post a Comment